Evaluation and Awards Program

Return to the Members Only Menu


ABOUT PICA EVALUATION AND AWARDS PROGRAM


“Level the playing field” is a VERY overworked phrase, but that is the driving force behind the remodeling of the PICA Awards and Evaluation Program. All PICA communicators do a great job fulfilling just what their companies need, regardless of budget, resources and experience.

Meeting the goal of the communication plan is the real purpose of print and electronic publications, although professional achievement and winning awards are very important as well. In the difficult task of analyzing this program and making changes we feel will give every communicator a chance to be recognized, we decided that the way a communication piece reaches its stated goal is probably the most important criterion of all. We will be asking you to tell us what the goal of a given piece is in almost all cases.

Please read these instructions carefully as you prepare your entries. Each award and its criteria are explained in detail. We hope these changes will be beneficial.

All print publication entries will receive the customary full written evaluation. Awards will still be presented in categories having more than six entries. First, Second, Third and, where appropriate, Honorable Mention awards will be presented.

Award Categories and Judging Criteria

BEST PRINT PUBLICATION
MAGAZINE: this category now includes four-color and two-color formats
NEWSLETTER: this category now includes newsletters with halftones and without

CRITERIA AND WEIGHT IN JUDGING: apply to all print publications

50% -- Purpose

  • The publication has a clearly stated goal; i.e., serves a particular audience with information to achieve a result – e.g., the publication provides information to the independent agency force which offers them recognition, tools to improve business and favorable information about the company which will encourage them to stay.
  • The publication fulfills that goal; e.g. the above established publication might measure success by an increase in profits and decrease in agents dropping the company. A new publication with this same focus measures success in early audience response and management’s reaction to the way the publication is perceived.
  • The publication’s content supports its stated purpose.

20% -- Readability

  • Use of clear language; i.e., a minimum of jargon, unexplained technical terms.
  • Avoids stilted phrases and wordiness
  • Avoids long, compound sentences or fragments
  • Stories are well framed and well-written

20% -- Effective Layout

  • Good use of color, art, photography and white space
  • Type faces are well-chose and readable
  • No more than three type faces are used throughout the publication
  • Page layouts are well-balanced; if a modular design (where all text is blocked) is used, it is consistent throughout the publication
  • Inside page design is consistent

10% -- Organization of material for easy reference

  • Stories are clearly delineated, not jumbled into a “grey” layout
  • Departments are clearly marked
  • The table of contents is comprehensive, easy to find and easily followed

MOST IMPROVED PUBLICATION:
MAGAZINE
NEWSLETTER

CRITERIA: Winners of this award should demonstrate real change over a year’s time.:

  • What changed?
  • Why did it change?
  • How did it change?
  • How did the change benefit both the publication and its audience? E.g. management decides the internal staff newsletter will now be a more formal publication that will include both staff and agents. The purpose is to instill a closer feel within the company (everyone working together for a common goal); recognize excellence; tell the company story in the home office and the agency office so staff and agency force, in effect, are public relations ambassadors. Success may be measured by a survey, a focus group, management reaction, etc.

BEST USE OF PHOTOGRAPHY: This category combines the former Best Black & White, Color Photo and Photo layout categories.

CRITERIA:

  • Photos or layouts must tell a story either in themselves or as effective support for a story
  • Achieve a purpose: how well do they achieve a desired effect?

BEST FEATURE STORY

CRITERIA:

  • Features tell a story and should be humanized as much as possible; e.g. using an individual who lived through a tornado and appreciated the agent’s rushing over as soon as the rain stopped, to tell the story.
  • Uses narrative style; e.g. personal or company profiles, describing an event before and after, perhaps through the eyes of those who participated.
  • Features are not necessarily time-constrained; they can run any time and still be pertinent.

BEST NEWS STORY

CRITERIA

  • Tells a factual story about an event or development; e.g. a new company president is elected, a fund drive is organized by the company; a new product is introduced; the company makes a statement on an issue.
  • Reader learns the five Ws (who, what, where, when, why) and one H (how) of the story immediately.
  • News stories can be humanized by focusing on an individual experiencing the story.
  • News stories are time-intensive. They must run when the story is fresh.

BEST ANNUAL REPORT

ANNUAL REPORTS WITH BUDGETS UNDER $3,000
ANNUAL REPORTS WITH BUDGETS OVER $3,000

CRITERIA

  • The annual report presents a snapshot of the company; gives the reader a feel for its culture.
  • High readability
  • Clarity; e.g., financial information is illustrated graphically as well as numerically

BEST COMPANY PROMOTION PROJECT: combines the former Best Brochures and Flyers category

PROJECTS WITH BUDGETS UNDER $5,000
PROJECTS WITH BUDGETS OVER $5,000

CRITERIA

  • Project has a clear mission and audience
  • Has expected results with a deadline
  • How will did it achieve its mission?

BEST WEB SITE

CRITERIA

  • Overall design; i.e., good use of color, readability
  • Organization of information
  • Ease of navigation; does it have a site map?
  • Adaptability to multiple browsers
  • Frequency of update
  • Ability to provide direct contact via e-mail or other means

Need Acrobat? Click here

Contact us



ABOUT CHERYL L. PONTIUS ...

PICA’s Publication Evaluator and Awards Judge

In addition to serving in the above capacity for PICA for the past three years, here are Cheryl Pontius’ qualifications:

  • BS in Journalism/Minors in English and Spanish from Indiana University
  • Served as the college newspaper’s editor in chief.
  • Employment history:
    -- Freelanced for Indianapolis News
    -- Wrote weekend wire copy for United Press International
    -- Wrote 11 p.m. news broadcast for Channel 8
    -- Served as interim director of communications for American United Life Insurance, Indianapolis, Ind.
    -- Reporter for Indianapolis Business Journal
    -- Spent seven years as editor and director of member
    services for the Hoosier State Press Association (the tradeorganization for newspapers in Indiana)
    -- Currently a guest lecturer at Indiana University/Purdue University, Indianapolis, in journalism
    -- Currently working as an independent contractor for Learnovation, an Indianapolis, Ind. educational publisher (editing all manuals and texts in English and Spanish)
    -- Acting as editing consultant for New Learning Concepts, Bloomington, Ind.
    -- Have been a judge for the Indiana High School Press Association’s Hoosier Star competition for several years.

Cheryl is the mother of four daughters, ages 15 to 21, with one granddaughter. She resides in Fishers, Ind., with her husband, Larry. Spare time pursuits include serving as secretary/editor of her neighborhood association newsletter, writing a mystery novel, gardening, bowling and reading.

Cheryl Pontius can be reached by phone at (317) 570-7793, or by e-mail at pontius_46@hotmail.com.

Download 2004 Entry Forms
2003 Evaluation and Awards Program Winners
Contact Us